[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] RE: Getiing Ready!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Ham [mailto:hamgva@cox.net] > Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 09:46 > To: emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: ejones@warningsystems.com > Subject: [emergency-msg] RE: Getiing Ready! > > On the other hand, all of the > messages use terminology for their tags that is derived from > THE SAME REFERENCE SCHEMA. Why should that schema not set the > name space for all of its derived messages? So, my > suggestion is to make the two line changes. In my mind, it > reduces complexity and has a logical basis as well. I totally agree. > I did not try to go to a single namespace for the messages > and common types because the types are imported, as opposed > to being actually form the same reference source in a > restriction sense. It alos keeps them encapsulated, so they > could be reused in the future. That makes sense to me. Alessandro
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]