Re: Resource Management Schema validation

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Thanks Gary,

I think we're in the best shape we can possibly 
manage at present, so we've done the best we can.

I going through all the fine-tooth combings now and will give it my own too.

Cheers,
Rex

At 11:26 AM -0500 1/26/08, Gary Ham wrote:
>I checked the RM Schemas and the examples from Revision 12 on-by-one.  I did
>not find an error.  I have attached the example in one zip and the schemas
>in the second.  The RM schemas and examples are EXACTLY as cut and pasted
>from the ACTUAL document, so there should be no difference.
>
>There is still the potential for an issue with CIQ.  The schema zip file
>contains CIQ schemas that work correctly with our examples. They do not 100%
>match CIQ 3.0 specification due to name space conflicts over x-link with the
>geo-oasis schemas (also included).  As a result we used the version of CIQ
>that was released for HAVE in which the namespace issues were resolved ....
>except...... our examples did not validate against that version either.
>Although the schemas appeared to validate, MS Visual Studio ran into
>reference (null pointer) errors when validating the actual examples.  When
>the schemas were loaded into Architag International's X-ray product, schema
>errors were identified by that product at the exact point that the null
>reference errors were occurring in MS Studio validation. So Alessandro made
>some minor adjustments to CIQ as released for HAVE that correct these
>errors. (The adjustments should not affect HAVE in any way.  They might
>actually correct potential bugs there as well.)
>
>So the schemas include the corrected version of the CIQ as released with
>HAVE.
>
>Discussions are ongoing with Ram Kumar from the CIQ committee. To this point
>he has not been able to reproduce the errors we saw with the tool set that
>he is using.  I am not exactly sure just why.  At any rate I will be
>identifying the specific changes we made to the XAL Schema to Ram. Perhaps
>they were put into 3.0 already but were not in the HAVE version which was a
>little earlier.  The namespace conflict would have masked the possibility.
>So, changes to our CIQ schemas before final release are possible, as we work
>things out with Ram, but they should in no way affect there work that has
>been done, nor should they affect the RM specification document itself. We
>may just need to update the CIQ schemas in the zip file once all issues are
>resolved.
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Gary A. Ham
>http://grandpaham.com
>703-899-6241
>Grandpa can do IT!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:56 AM
>To: hamgva@cox.net; Rex Brooks; emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org;
>ejones@warningsystems.com; 'Timothy Grapes'
>Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Plan for EDXL-RM review and TC vote - RE:
>[emergency] Groups - EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.
>(EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.doc) uploaded
>
>Exactly, Gary,
>
>Great!
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>
>At 8:43 AM -0500 1/24/08, <hamgva@cox.net> wrote:
>>One zip for the schhemas, including the CIQ and geo-oasis imports.
>>One more zip for the examples.
>>
>>---- Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:
>>>   Thanks Gary,
>>>
>>>   I assume you will bundle up all the schemas in a tidy single package
>>>   so reviewers won't have to go out and get anything in order to
>>>   implement and/or review the spec.
>>>
>>>   Cheers,
>>>   Rex
>>>
>>>   At 8:06 PM -0500 1/23/08, Gary Ham wrote:
>>>   >I will reproof the schemas, and validate the examples this weekend and
>send
>>>   >you a new zip of the schemas and examples as separate items this
>weekend.
>>>   >
>>>   >R/s
>>>   >
>>>   >Gary A. Ham
>>>   >http://grandpaham.com
>>>   >703-899-6241
>>>   >Grandpa can do IT!
>>>   >
>>>   >-----Original Message-----
>>>   >From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>>>   >Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:08 PM
>  >>  >To: Timothy Grapes; ejones@warningsystems.com;
>>>   >emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>   >Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] Plan for EDXL-RM review and TC vote - RE:
>>>   >[emergency] Groups - EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.
>  >>  >(EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.doc) uploaded
>>>   >
>>>   >Thanks Tim,
>>>   >
>>>   >Just a quick note to say that I uploaded EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012
>>>   >to the Specifications folder of the TC Document Repository and you
>>>   >all can get a leg up on reviewing it before the final version is
>>>   >uploaded Monday. We really think that only typographical corrections
>>>   >are likely in the final version, and we have at least five people
>>>   >proofreading for those now.
>>>   >
>>>   >Cheers, and thanks to all who have worked on this specification,
>>>   >Rex
>>>   >
>>>   >At 6:00 PM -0500 1/23/08, Timothy Grapes wrote:
>>>   >>Elysa et al,
>>>   >>
>>>   >>The EDXL-RM sub-committee is currently performing its final
>>>   >>"fine-tooth-comb" review of the specification.  Current version 012
>>>   >>was published today and is available for review.  Our plan is to
>>>   >>publish the sub-committee final document (with only very minor
>>>   >>revisions) by Monday, Jan. 28.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>We would like to propose a special TC meeting be scheduled for
>>>   >>Thursday Jan. 31 to vote the specification into its 2nd public
>>>   >>comment period.  If this time-frame is acceptable for TC review and
>>>   >>preparation to vote, request that you schedule this call.  If anyone
>>>   >>feels additional review time is needed, please advise and schedule
>>>   >>soonest thereafter.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>Thanks,
>>>   >>
>>>   >>Tim
>>>   >>
>>>   >>-----Original Message-----
>>>   >>From: rexb@starbourne.com [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]
>>>   >>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:58 PM
>>>   >>To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>   >>Subject: [emergency] Groups - EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.
>>>   >>(EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.doc) uploaded
>>>   >>
>>>   >>This is the clean (all changes accepted) version of EDXL-RM uploaded
>on 23
>>>   >>January 2008. It is being proofread for the final version on which the
>>>   >>EM-Msg SC will recommend a TC vote. It is expected that the only
>changes
>>>   >>between this version and the version to be voted will be minor
>>>   >>typographical corrections.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>   -- Rex Brooks*
>>>   >>
>>>   >>The document named EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.
>>>   >>(EDXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.doc) has been submitted by Rex
>>>Brooks* to the
>>>   >>OASIS Emergency Management TC document repository.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>Document Description:
>>>   >>This is the clean (all changes accepted) version of EDXL-RM uploaded
>on 23
>>>   >>January 2008. It is being proofread for the final version on which the
>>>   >>EM-Msg SC will recommend a TC vote. It is expected that the only
>changes
>>>   >>between this version and the version to be voted will be minor
>>>   >>typographical corrections.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>View Document Details:
>>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/document.php?docume
>n
>>   > >t_id=26919
>>>   >>
>>>   >>Download Document:
>>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/26919/
>E
>>>   >DXL-RM-CD-v1.0-Revision-012.doc
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >>PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email
>>>   >application
>>>   >>may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and
>>>   >paste
>>>   >>the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>-OASIS Open Administration
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>   >  >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>>>   >>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
>>>   >OASIS
>>>   >>at:
>>>   >>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >--
>>>   >Rex Brooks
>>>   >President, CEO
>>>   >Starbourne Communications Design
>>>   >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>>>   >Berkeley, CA 94702
>>>   >Tel: 510-898-0670
>>>   >
>>>   >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>   >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>  >>  >generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your
>>>TCs in OASIS
>>>   >at:
>>>   >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>>   Rex Brooks
>  >>  President, CEO
>>>   Starbourne Communications Design
>>>   GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>>>   Berkeley, CA 94702
>>>   Tel: 510-898-0670
>>>
>>>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>   To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>>>   generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
>OASIS
>>>   at:
>>>   https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>>
>
>
>--
>Rex Brooks
>President, CEO
>Starbourne Communications Design
>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>Berkeley, CA 94702
>Tel: 510-898-0670
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:RMExamples080126.zip (pZIP/«IC») (00369A18)
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:RMSchemas080126.zip (pZIP/«IC») (00369A19)


--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670