[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] SitRep Issue
I sent a direct reply essentially saying the same thing – there is a requirement, but the intention was to use the DE distribution type “Request” – though we need to discuss how the recipient knows “what” is being requested… Thanks, Tim Grapes Evotec 703-304-4829 From: McGarry, Donald P. [mailto:dmcgarry@mitre.org] So I'll say that I don't think we need this. Having a request message implies a req/reply messaging implementation and does not coincide with the conops of filling out ics forms or sit rep reports. This capability could be handled by sending a de with the dist type of request or through other implementation specific mechanisms. At this point I am wary of adding anything else to this spec as it is already pretty hefty. From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rex.brooks@ncoic.org] Hi Everyone, · as a part of the use of the DE which has it as a distributionType, · as a Request for Information from Table 3 of the Requirements pdf (which I would suggest be a request for one of the specific report types, and, · as a part of Response Resources (particularly when making use of RM.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]