This is the problem for which we need an Errata.
Cheers,
Rex
-------- Original Message --------
| Subject: | EDXL-RM Schema inconsistent with Standard (text and data dictionary) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:40:19 -0400 |
| From: | Joerg, Werner <Werner.Joerg@iem.com> |
| To: | Rex Brooks <rex.brooks@ncoic.org>, THOMAS FERRENTINO <tferrentino@verizon.net> |
| CC: | Aymond, Patti <Patti.Aymond@iem.com> |
Rex, Tom
Some of our folks are working on a project with EDXL-RM and have discovered that the standard (EDXL-RM 1.0 Errata) consistently lists EstimatedReturnArrival under ScheduleType in ResponseToRequestResource, but the schema (p. 145) does not. If my recollection is correct, this parameter was added in the Errata and therefore I suspect that the schema was not updated accordingly.
I have advised our team to stick to the schema as the ultimate reference, but as an OASIS/EM member, I think this is a discrepancy that needs to be addressed swiftly and I’d like your input on how we should proceed, from the EM/ Msg&Notif SC and EMA perspectives. (FYI: our team has identified only DisasterLAN as having implemented the RM Standard as *written*).
Cheers,
Werner
Werner B Joerg
(801)
619 6126 (O)
(801) 557 7160 (M)
(801) 553 8134 (F)
Croire c'est s'avoir