OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency-rim message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [emergency-have] Closing out HAVE 2.0


Close out thought--Boy, we're really gonna miss you Darrell. If you get lonely for us, you're always welcome.

Best of Everything,
Rex


On 6/12/2018 7:34 AM, Darrell O'Donnell wrote:
So for clarity - put the CT WD07 document at the same level of the EDXL-HAVE main XSD, sharing the same ./ImportedSchema folder?


Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng.

darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com


On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:03 AM, rexbroo <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:

My suggestion: A -- pull wd07 separately from its surrounding structure, and include it and the imported schema in the folder structure of the EDXL-HAVE-v2.0 package. Unless I'm way off base, it should work with the ./ImportedSchema schema location of EDXL-HAVE-v2.0, yes? I am copying this to the RIM SC., Elysa and Jeff Waters in case Jeff disagrees.

Cheers,
Rex


On 6/11/2018 11:20 AM, Darrell O'Donnell wrote:
I am looking to close out on this before my membership dies (13JUN). I just tried to load in the WD07 document but it's got it's own ./ImportedSchema folder structure. What should we do there? Choices seem to be:

A. Put EDXL-CT in the same folder as the main HAVE schema folder.
B. Use a ./ImportedSchema/ImportedSchema folder - and duplicate everything (this one feels whacked).


Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng.

darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com


On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM, rexbroo <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:

edxl-xAL.xsd: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-ciq/v1.0/csd04/xsd/edxl-xAL.xsd

edxl-xPIL.xsd: http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-ciq/v1.0/csd04/xsd/edxl-xPIL.xsd

We still have to vote on making edxl-ct-v1.0-wd07 the new Committee Specification, csd04 after which there will be a similarly "official" "source of truth" file location like above, but for the moment we'll have to let that slide. It would be helpful if I could get the level of permission necessary to make the final schema changes incorporating the new "official" edxl-ct-v1.0.xsd which will take place once the ballot is approved.

I'll be very sorry to see ya go and will miss ya very much.

Cheers,
Rex


On 5/8/2018 10:12 AM, Darrell O'Donnell wrote:
Folks - what steps do we need to take to move EDXL HAVE 2.0 back to the TC? My (become vague) recollection is that the following needs to happen:

* Alignment with HL7 "front matter"
* XSD adjusted to reflect minor changes to EDXL-CT. Where are the "source of truth" files for this? I can make these changes and get them checked into SVN this weekend. 

A driver behind my questions is my looming OASIS membership expiry next month. I don't currently plan to renew it. 

Any input would be awesome!

Thanks a ton!

cheers,

Darrell



Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng.

darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com



-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 

Virus-free. www.avast.com


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 


-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]