[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-tep] TEP WD03 status
Cheers, Rex On 3/6/2013 7:44 AM, Mr. Werner Joerg wrote:
I am working at present with Brian on the schema issues, and Rex has offered to help on the EA graphical representation. I expect that some further adjustments will be needed in the specification and the EA diagrams, once the schema is cleared. Now, here are a few items where I am seeking input from the TEP SC members (referring to the Jan. 11 posting EDXL-TEP-v1.0 WD03 - Spec. + Schemas [https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-tep/download.php/47882/edxl-tep-v1.0-wd03.zip]): - Check section 1.2 History - Review section 2.1 Design Philosophy - Question: is the link included in section 2.2 permissible? - Review section 2.3 Example Usage Scenarios - In section 18.104.22.168 Identifying Message Type there is a statement as will be detailed later I dont know how that came in here, and I wonder what it refers to. - Section 3.6 TEP Elements feels both a bit skinny (the text) and overloaded (the graphics) any suggestions for improvement? - Several points raised in the Data Dictionary (flagged with yellow highlight or comment boxes), in particular: o current Medication o barriersToPatientCare o evacuationDestinationRequired o evacuationDestinationRequiredDefault o providerJurisdiction o providerCountry o personnelJurisdiction o TransportType o vehicleJurisdiction o PatientEncounterType o PatientCareType o contaminationRadiationContagionStatus o PatientIDType and finally: - Section 4.13 Glossary / List of Acronyms: Various Acronyms not defined, or defined but not used anywhere in the spec.
-- Rex Brooks GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Phone: 510-898-0670