OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [emergency] Incident Command System (ICS) wording inRequirementsdocument?

Cathy M. Subatch
E Team Inc.
818.932.0660 x248
310.770.6885 (mobile)

-----Forwarded by Cathy Subatch/Consultant/Eteam on 03/27/2003 09:11AM -----

To: rcarlton@eteam.com (Rick Carlton)
From: "R. Allen Wyke" <emtc@nc.rr.com>
Date: 03/26/2003 05:05PM
cc: csubatch@eteam.com (Cathy Subatch)
Subject: Re: [emergency] Incident Command System (ICS) wording in Requirementsdocument?

Here is another....
I also noticed that, and think our TC deliverables in Q3 2003
(specifically the compliance test suite and implementer's guide) could
apply to this directly.

On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 03:08 PM, <RCarlton@eteam.com> wrote:

> I would also call everyone's attention to the "certification" language
> in PD 5, I believe in clause 15 (sorry ladies and gents I don't have
> it in front of me presently), based on my experience with various
> military and agency doctines the verbiage strongly suggests that
> formal certification of some kind, (probably to be defined under Phase
> 1 - April '03), will be a precursor to any inititive being included
> within the NIMS construct. If we do our work effectively enough,
> therefore, it is possible that initial EM-TC products "could" be
> included as elemental components of that certification. So, the
> compliance stakes are VERY high here.

R. Allen Wyke
Chair, Emergency Management TC

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]