[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Agenda: 7/1 Call
1. SC Updates with a focus on helping the MSG SC finalize their plans for CAP, including reference implementations, etc. 2. DMI-Services Tech Session 7/15: mini-f2f (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emergency/200306/msg00025.html)? Let's decide today. 3. Cross Standard Definition of Incident Types: a recent thread within the MSG SC (several messages - starts with http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emergency-msg/200306/msg00024.html) got my gears turning and I wanted to throw something out to the group and get feedback. In a nutshell, do we think we will use incident types across several/all of our standards? If so, should we define those external to any one standard as part of its own data dictionary? That way each of our standards could use it as they need/see fit. Note that I do not want to slow or disrupt CAP with this question, so the "right" answer might be two pronged (short-term vs. long-term). Art had some good comments/thoughts on why we need to be VERY careful to even CONSIDER this, so this is not by any means a definite. Art, can you pull together notes from that email and reply to this message at some point with your thoughts? 4. Site Summaries: another topic that came up within the MSG SC (see minutes http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emergency-msg/200306/msg00026.html) that has to do with the concept of being able to get the "headers" of messages rather than the whole thing. Where this benefits implementers is when there are a large number of messages - you can get the headers and then decide which ones you want the full message for. This concept - getSummaryList() - might be a good thing for the IF SC to bat around, because it could certainly apply to most of our efforts. Any thoughts from the group? 5. Next Focus: Now that CAP is getting well underway, we need to make sure we have additional efforts tee-ed up and ready to roll. Looks like ICS within the MSG SC is a potential leading contender, as is the idea of sharing incident data (think the Tie schema from the DMI-Services guys). Please throw out any others that have been on your minds, so that we can debate. -- R. Allen Wyke Chair, Emergency Management TC emtc@nc.rr.com http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]