[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Whatever Happened to the Public UDDI? Web Service s Registries Fad e
This is all true and about to change, hopefully for the better, very soon. Karl Best made several announcements yesterday of specifications now submitted for voting upon as OASIS-wide standards, and one of them is WSRP, Web Services for Remote Portlets. While this deals mainly with Portals per se, it seems likely that most web services will employed within such a structure for just these access control and security reasons, and for achieving the ability to define permissions within producer, consumer and user contexts appropriately. This spec was designed in conjunction with JSR168, the Java Portlet spec, to ensure a wider applicability and has been tested with J2EE and .Net. It should be noted that registries are going to be quite useful, but need only be starting points for more complete negotiations and contracts. Some will, some won't. UDDI and ebXML are there now and can be added to. CAP will be ready sooner rather than later. That sets the stage for some fairly important developments. Ciao, Rex At 12:41 PM -0500 7/29/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >Right. In industry, the keiretsu phenomenon dominates. >One needs not just partners, but credible partners. >And rules are very different given the process, say >a procurement offer vs a services offer, and so on. >UDDI doesn't help much here and it can actually make >it much tougher to negotiate a good deal. > >The same can be said of public safety agencies, but one >questions if that can be maintained in the face of current >events and requirements. However, what the public safety >groups as a whole should be discussing are the services >that can be exposed more or less across agencies of >different types because this cannot be based on the >data they create or share. As you know, the Internal >Affairs group cannot expose name or incident information >to other internal agencies. Dissemination Management >is required to ensure redaction of information shared >to the public given a juvenile, for example, and so >forth. So the business rules for standard services >have to be worked out. A registry is fairly easy >given that. > >len > > >From: Aerts, John F. [mailto:jfaerts@lasd.org] > >Yvonne L. Lee and David Rubinstein, Software Development Times > >A few years ago, when Web services were envisioned as creating >interconnected applications that spanned across businesses, public >Universal Description, Discovery and Integration (UDDI) registries >were seen as a tree on which to find the fruit -- or external Web >services. Now that Web services are used almost exclusively for >internal development and integration, not only has the hype >surrounding the public UDDI registries subsided, but the >information in them hasn't grown either. > ><http://sdtimes.com/news/082/special2.htm> > > > >You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgro >up.php > >You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgroup.php -- Rex Brooks GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com Email: rexb@starbourne.com Tel: 510-849-2309 Fax: By Request
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]