OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [emergency] Public as responders (was RE: [emergency]...PPWletter re CAP)

[This thread might seem a bit off-topic but I suspect it may have 
Infrastructure implications, as well as illustrating one reason we 
can't always draw the circle as tightly around our Messaging 
applications as a first glance might suggest.]

Claude -

Absolutely, dispatch centers should be included in any overall 
emergency information model... although I can report from experience 
that only in theory is there merely a one-way flow (call for service) 
from public to officialdom... the reality is more complicated, as 
most any 9-1-1 recording will illustrate.

That said, I know that NENA is interested in  standards for data 
flows between Computer Aided Dispatch centers.  So is APCO and I 
believe it's also a theme in the IEEE 1512 program.  And, of course, 
in the JXDD.  Also, the ComCARE Alliance is involved in some very 
advanced work on the dissemination of incident information, both 
among response agencies and to and from official responders in the 

But my point was that a lot of the lifesaving response in a disaster 
doesn't involve 9-1-1 or any officially-designated responders at 
all... that's one of the ways disasters are different from day-to-day 
public-safety response (although the role of civilian bystanders is 
significant in a lot of "routine" incidents, too.)  So sharing 
information with the public isn't just a matter of directing their 
aggregate behaviors... it's also important in supporting the 
large-scale "people helping people" processes that takes up the slack 
during a disaster response.

- Art

At 4:06 PM -0500 10/8/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Then the Dispatch/911 system should be involved.  There
>are various approaches to this but they aren't a matter
>of notification of the public, but of the public notifying
>the Dispatch center.  A question of some importance would be
>what kind of notification is the public responder giving
>to the Dispatch operator, eg, a Call For Service?  How
>to classify the notification and queue the response is
>more difficult than working out the technology for getting
>the image from a cell phone into the CFS records.  My guess
>is that a survey of existing 911 Dispatch systems would
>reveal that many could do that.  It would be reasonably
>straightforward, for example, to provide a public access
>version of our web products that would enable the public
>to do that, but as you say, the administrative problems
>would be difficult.  It is more likely that a call to
>the dispatcher would get resources dispatched quicker,
>but that an ability to store and forward on the scene
>digital media files could be created for intel purposes.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]