RE: [emergency] Groups - ICS-201-draft0.2.xsd uploaded

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

I understand.  I wouldn't do it.  "Good fences" and all that... 
If the owners won't do it, then it is an open opportunity but 
is it within scope of this TC? 

The phrase "incident information" covers a lot 
of territory in public safety systems.

len

From: R. Allen Wyke [mailto:emergency-tc@earthlink.net]

This is where my concern about the TC's approach comes in. I feel we 
are stepping out of bounds to even think about defining a schema for 
something we don't own. I think it might be a better idea to push the 
powers that be that wrote/defined NIMS to formalize a movement to do 
such, which may or may not include this TC (or some of its members).