[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Circle and Polygon
Could be. I think we need more info. Ciao, Rex At 8:03 AM -0700 6/13/05, Art Botterell wrote: >On Jun 11, 2005, at 6/11/05 4:50 AM, Rex Brooks wrote: >>I happen to think that either a rule of thumb, or a specified limit >>to the number of lat/long points might serve to solve the problem, >>such that practitioners can automatically apply an optimization >>algorithm before sending a message. > >Um. Well, reduction of geospatial polygons, either in a smoothing >mode or (more likely for alerts) in an "enveloping" mode, is >certainly a fact of life. > >Still, I'm having difficulty with the idea that we would adopt a >format that roughly doubles the byte-size of each polygon, and then >ask senders to reduce the resolution of their data to compensate. >Seems like that might be a triumph of form over function, doesn't it? > >Anyway, I'm not sure anyone is actually having a problem with the >existing polygon format, so are we in danger of trying to fix >something that isn't really broken? > >- Art > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS >at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]