Re: [emergency] URI and derefURI

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 8 Jun 2005, at 16:35, Art Botterell wrote:
> So yes, it seems like we do need the relative URI, but my mind is open 
> as to whether it should have its own element associated with the 
> presence of a <derefUri>.

As you point out in a subsequent email: "relying on the particular data 
value to inform the semantics seems like it may be unnecessarily 
tricky"

So, it would be a better model to have either:
  1 - URI element
  or
  2 - FileLocation and inlineData element


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
Project Leader, NICTA, Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
P: +61 7 3000 0484 F: +61 7 3000 0480 M: +61 4 1313 2206
E: renato@nicta.com.au W: http://nicta.com.au


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.