RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

["Tom Merkle" <TMerkle@capwin.org>]

I like the element names showing the specific origin of an element name,
such as Art shows below. This removes any doubts as to where the element
origin is from when looking at the XML schema.


Regards,
 
Tom Merkle
 
CapWIN:        www.capwin.org 
Phone:        (301) 614-3720
Cell Phone:   (240) 375-1966
Fax:          (301) 614-0581
e-mail:        tmerkle@capwin.org
 
CapWIN
6305 Ivy Lane Suite 300
Capital Office Park
Greenbelt, MD 20770

-----Original Message-----
From: Art Botterell [mailto:acb@incident.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:41 PM
To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

On Jun 16, 2005, at 6/16/05 7:11 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
> Perhaps a good compromise is to add explicit (attribute) information 
> that indicates the spatial reference system used by the element, and 
> that it is the external edge?

We've stayed clear of attributes for various reasons, but would it
achieve the same end to name the elements something like <wgs84polygon>
and <wgs84circle>?

- Art


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php