[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon
On Jun 20, 2005, at 6/20/05 8:49 AM, Carl Reed OGC wrote: > There is a way forward that is simple, non-disruptive, and provides > 100% backwards compatibility. Well, I'm sure the TC will look forward to hearing about it. As you know, my personal concerns are: 1) That we not complicate CAP implementation for thin devices any more than absolutely necessary; and, 2) That we not spawn inconsistent representations of target areas that could hamper global interoperability. And, of course, I'm still not sure we've established that this actually is a significant problem... and I say that will all due respect to those several advocates who seem so passionate about it. Certainly we've identified a number of precedents for standardizing on a single CRS, and I'm still not clear on exactly why that can't continue to work for us, too. - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]