Re: [emergency] RE: Question on EDXL-DE schema

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 20 Jan 2006, at 10:30, Art Botterell wrote:

> Meanwhile, I understand that several folks are playing with  
> experimental extensions that they may or may not propose for  
> ratification later.  Might it make sense to create two versions of  
> the schema... a strict one to go in the spec, and an  
> "experimentors' edition" (with the "##anys") in an application note  
> or whatever?  That way maybe we could encourage experimentation  
> without diluting the spec itself.

And the experimental schema can go into the EDXL Cookbook...


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
National ICT Australia (NICTA)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.