[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject
Yup. Ciao, Rex At 9:45 AM +1000 1/31/06, Renato Iannella wrote: >On 31 Jan 2006, at 04:05, Elysa Jones wrote: > >>I don't think anyone on the TC is interested in going back for a >>60-day review at this point in the EDXL-DE. If anyone feels >>strongly the other way with respect to this change, please let me >>know. > >Not that I feel strongly about it, but we should be aware that the >OASIS TC process defines "Substantive Change" as: > > "a change to a specification that would require a compliant application or > implementation to be modified or rewritten in order to remain compliant." > >This is undoubtedly the case for the current version of EDXL-DE. > > >Cheers... Renato Iannella >National ICT Australia (NICTA) > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally >privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, >use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended >recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both >messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, >data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised >amendment. This notice should not be removed. -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]