Re: [emergency] Inconsistency in CAP 1.1 Specification

[Elysa Jones <ejones@warningsystems.com>]

Art, Are you still keeping the issues list for CAP?  There are now several 
things that need to be cleaned up in 1.1.  I will put this topic on our 
next meeting agenda (3/21).  What is the will of the group?  Shall we 
prepare an Errata?  Focus on a schedule for 2.0?  Regards, Elysa

At 04:30 PM 3/7/2006, Art Botterell wrote:
>Oops.  The "Assess" value should be in the schema, even though it's
>deprecated for public warning applications.  If you need it, maybe we
>should publish an updated schema as an Erratum.
>
>- Art
>
>
>
>On Mar 7, 2006, at 3/7/06 1:50 PM, Ham, Gary A wrote:
>
>>In the official CAP 1.1 specification, the value "Assess" is an
>>allowed value for <responseType> per the data dictionary. That
>>value is missing from the schema within the document.  Which is
>>correct?
>>
>>Gary A. Ham
>>Senior Research Scientist
>>Battelle Memorial Institute
>>540-288-5611 (office)
>>703-869-6241 (cell)
>>"You would be surprised what you can accomplish when you do not
>>care who gets the credit." - Harry S. Truman
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>