[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: USHIK and the HAVE standard
FYI – below are additional comments on HAVE. Sukumar From:
ljreece@knowsol.com [mailto:ljreece@knowsol.com] Sukumar,
Tx, Laura >Sukumar > I've registered for the list
but have not had a confirmation so I'm forwarding the comments to you as
well. IF the confirmation comes through tomorrow morning, I'll post it
then. >Notes: -Typo in value of
BedType:OpeatingRooms has been corrected to OperatingRooms
-Typo (?) in EMSAirTransportStatus >and EMSAmbulanceStatus Comments:
repeated phrase: average
offload
>-ClinicalStatus attribute in
Figure 1 appears to be ClinicalOperations element in Data Dictionary (page 48)
(which is
>correct?)
>-CommentText is not used
directly by Hospital, as claimed in CommentText
element. Correct?
>-OBGYN Class has an OBGYN
element - the only duplicate name in the model. Is
this intended?
>-The bolding of element names
in the dictionary has been preserved in the spreadsheet. There is no
apparent pattern to the bolding. Does the bolding carry
>any
meaning?
>-The element EOCStatus has two
permissible values, but no value meanings. Value meanings for the purpose
of USHIK and the ISO/IEC 11179 standards are a >name and definition of what
the values represent. >Thanks, >Laura Reece, Ph.D. >USHIK Project Team |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]