[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: USHIK and the HAVE standard
FYI – below are additional comments on HAVE.
> I've registered for the list but have not had a confirmation so I'm forwarding the comments to you as well. IF the confirmation comes through tomorrow morning, I'll post it then.
>Notes: -Typo in value of BedType:OpeatingRooms has been corrected to OperatingRooms -Typo (?) in EMSAirTransportStatus >and EMSAmbulanceStatus Comments: repeated phrase: average offload
>-ClinicalStatus attribute in Figure 1 appears to be ClinicalOperations element in Data Dictionary (page 48) (which is >correct?)
>-CommentText is not used directly by Hospital, as claimed in CommentText element. Correct?
>-OBGYN Class has an OBGYN element - the only duplicate name in the model. Is this intended?
>-The bolding of element names in the dictionary has been preserved in the spreadsheet. There is no apparent pattern to the bolding. Does the bolding carry >any meaning?
>-The element EOCStatus has two permissible values, but no value meanings. Value meanings for the purpose of USHIK and the ISO/IEC 11179 standards are a >name and definition of what the values represent.
>Laura Reece, Ph.D.
>USHIK Project Team