Re: [emergency] Re: CAP 1.1 Standard and ITU-T Recommendation - TC Task 2 - References

[Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>]

On 28 Apr 2007, at 01:11, Rex Brooks wrote:

> Mime Types which we specify in the DOM but do not call out every  
> time it is required in the data dictionary is another example.  
> Also, for Mime Types, we cite RFC 1521 and ITU cites RFC 2046-1996.  
> I don't know how we should handle this. They explicitly cite XML  
> Signature and Emcyrption specs from W3C, which we don't.

CAP 1.1 was changed to RFC2046 (from RFC1521) so both are the same.

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA