Re: [emergency] CAP 1.1 Standard and ITU-T Recommendation

[Elysa Jones <ejones@warningsystems.com>]

I will be putting a complete note out to the list soon on our 
summary/status on the three tasks.  We will plan to review the status 
on our call tomorrow.  I am hopeful to have this complete now in time 
to submit to ITU by May 10.  Thanks, Elysa

At 11:51 AM 4/30/2007, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Elysa,
>
>Do we have an update on where things stand?
>
>Cheers,
>Rex
>
>At 8:27 AM -0500 4/27/07, Elysa Jones wrote:
>>Agreed, I'll ask the OASIS Staff about any guidance along these 
>>lines.  Thanks, Elysa
>>
>>At 08:20 AM 4/27/2007, Rex Brooks wrote:
>>>Makes good sense to me.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Rex
>>>
>>>At 11:29 PM -0700 4/26/07, Art Botterell wrote:
>>>>Friends -
>>>>
>>>>Sounds like a lot of important details are being picked up here, 
>>>>so may I offer a more general suggestion?  Is there someplace 
>>>>where it is, or could be, stated explicitly that our overriding 
>>>>intent is for the ASN.1 and XML codings to represent the same 
>>>>data structure interchangeably?
>>>>
>>>>That might seem trivial or obvious, but there's always the 
>>>>possibility that some small inconsistency will slip past our 
>>>>collective inspection, however thorough.  Might it be prudent, 
>>>>therefore, to memorialize our overall intent as an added 
>>>>safeguard against some accidental artifact being mistaken for 
>>>>intentional at some point in the future?
>>>>
>>>>- Art
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Rex Brooks
>>>President, CEO
>>>Starbourne Communications Design
>>>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>>>Berkeley, CA 94702
>>>Tel: 510-849-2309
>
>
>--
>Rex Brooks
>President, CEO
>Starbourne Communications Design
>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>Berkeley, CA 94702
>Tel: 510-849-2309
>