OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: FW: EDXL-HAVE /CIQ - public review question

FYI – clarifications from OASIS.





From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:37 PM
To: Dwarkanath, Sukumar
Cc: ejones@warningsystems.com; 'Ram Kumar'
Subject: RE: EDXL-HAVE /CIQ - public review question


Hi Sukumar,


  There's a few things to consider.


1. Reference the specific version of CIQ v3.0. This ensures that people will know exactly which version you're talking about.

2. If the reference to CIQ is normative, and CIQ changes in such a way that it will also require another 15-day review (meaning substantive changes are made post-public review), and those changes impact the use of CIQ in EDXL-HAVE, another public review would be required - *if the TC chooses to update the reference and incorporate that same set of changes*. It's possible that there could be substantive changes to CIQ that don't impact EDXL-HAVE, but I'm not familiar enough with either spec to make such a determination.

3. If the TC decides to stick with the reference to the public review version and not update the reference, *or* if no substantive changes are made to the spec and it reaches CS status and the TC chooses to update the reference, no additional review period is required.


Ram, as chair, might be able to shed more light on the anticipated outcome.


Please let me know if you have further questions or need additional assistance.







From: Dwarkanath, Sukumar [mailto:Sukumar_Dwarkanath@sra.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:09 PM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Cc: ejones@warningsystems.com; Ram Kumar
Subject: EDXL-HAVE /CIQ - public review question



EDXL-HAVE currently uses CIQ v3.0 (public review version 02 – current public comment version) and the TC will be voting to publish EDXL-HAVE for its second public comment period soon.  But before making this decision, the TC members want to fully understand the implications of including a public comment version as part of the proposed specification. To be more specific, we plan to include a note in the public review version of HAVE that the CIQ version will be replaced after its approval, pending the actions of the CIQ TC. So, we are trying to get guidance from OASIS - how will this impact the post-public comment period of HAVE – do we need another 15 day review once we include the newly approved CIQ?









Sukumar Dwarkanath


SRA International

1920 N Street NW

Washington DC 20002



202-449-7761 (direct)

703-629-4074 (mobile)

202-338-6106 (fax)





This electronic message transmission contains information from SRA International, Inc., which may be confidential, privileged or proprietary. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic information in error, please notify SRA immediately by telephone at 866-584-2143.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]