[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Use Case
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 08:47 > To: Alessandro Triglia; 'Rex Brooks'; 'Elysa Jones'; > emergency@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [emergency] Use Case > > I don't have a problem with this, but the fact is that we do need to > make a definitive statement for EIC, and I'm not going to stand in > the way of moving forward to OASIS approval. So what I would propose > is adopting a position that stands behind the conformance section, > but draws the distinction between conformance and how much of the > specification needs to implemented. > > Perhaps we could say: > > "While the conformance section does not mandate that all specific > message types must be implemented, we suggest implementors develop > against the set of message types they consider necessary for their > purposes. We would appreciate if implementors who are OASIS member > companies test their implementations during development and issue a > Statement of Use when they are satisfied that their implementations > are functioning correctly for the minimum requirements of the > conformance section." That looks very good. Alessandro > > We could fine tune such language to satisfy the needs of EIC for > providing guidance on this topic. > > Cheers, > Rex
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]