emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Issues with EDXL-HAVE Committee Specification XSD
- From: "David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>
- To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:27:50 -0700
Elysa,
Attached PDF.
Having reviewed this and generated latest (R5) into CAM template - and started working with the new Want List exclude() features in CAM - I hit on this - that I'd previously missed.
Clearly right now - we're forcing people to provide all the items marked in red.
This is not consistent with our approach in the main structure.
And it will be a significant burden on message design and implementation.
We can quickly solve this easily be making these items marked - as optional.
I'd like to propose we update the XSD accordingly.
Thanks, DW
EDXL-HAVE Structure Issues.pdf
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]