[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re CAP-IPAWS Profile Specification Issues
At today's meeting, the EMTC discussed whether to accept a drafting recommendation that the DHS IPAWS requirements be included as an appendix to the CAP profile itself as a Committee Draft. Art opposes that material being included, for reasons stated in earlier e-mails. Which is fine. But there've also been insinuations of inappropiate behavior by those who disagree. That's not fine, and we have to respectfully disagree with Art's assertion of an improper conflict here. The TC can chose to include the material, or not, as it sees fit. Sometimes TCs include contributed non-normative material; sometimes they don't. This is not a policy matter. But it also was suggested that TC members who are DHS staff or DHS contractors are acting improperly, if they favor including the DHS material. That's silly. Standards committee members are all experts, with biases, which they bring into a TC ... to hammer out compromises .. which is what we do in standards work. As long as the deliberations are carried out properly and transparently under our rules, no-one should be attacked for having an opinion. It also was suggested that OASIS or its staff has some intent to control the TC. That's silly, too. The TC is free to make its own choices. Art expressed concern about the contract OASIS made with DHS to provide some assistance and information to DHS about the spec. OASIS could not have agreed to a contract that asked us to influence or assure the technical decisions made by the TC. And we didn't. Because we don't have that power. The contract was not posted to the TC because, for whatever reason, the contractor set some rules around how it's disclosed. Which Art and everyone is welcome to pursue. We respectfully suggest that the TC members focus on the technical merits of excluding or including the appendix, rather than impugning motives, and then resolve the issue by voting. Regards JBC ~ James Bryce Clark ~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS ~ http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark > Friends - > > In the course of today's Emergency Management TC meeting a DHS > representative expressed the opinion that OASIS is under a contractual > obligations to expedite the processing of the IPAWS profile over and above > the OASIS TC Process. As we've been unable to obtain a copy of that > contract, and considering that the numerous OASIS staff who were taking an > active part in our meeting didn't appear to contradict that claim, I guess > we have to assume that it's true. > > Therefore I'm forced, reluctantly, to the conclusion that this process is > seriously compromised by conflicts of interest. I have asked that my name > be removed from the list of editors of the IPAWS draft and I will be > considering whether renewing my agency's OASIS membership would be in the > best interests of the people of Contra Costa County. > > - Art
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]