[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: CAP 1.2 numbering?
Alas, it appears we're asked for yet another uncomfortable compromise for entirely non-technical reasons. I'm told that at the NAB convention in Las Vegas last week, Tom Beers of the FCC expressed some concern about using CAP 1.2 because the Commission's Report and Order on EAS specified CAP 1.1. ("Technology advances, but Law persists.") He reportedly suggested calling it "CAP 1.1a" instead. I'm not much of stickler about numbering schemes, myself, as long as things can be differentiated. Under the circumstances, does anyone see any insurmountable problem with calling the next version either "1.1a" or perhaps "1.1.01"? - Art Art Botterell, Manager Community Warning System Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff 50 Glacier Drive Martinez, California 94553 (925) 313-9603 fax (925) 646-1120
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]