[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary =?UTF-8?Q?alignment=3F?=
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary alignment?
From: "Embley, Paul" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, July 12, 2009 10:25 am
To: <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This is actually something I can contribute to this group. I will notify all the right people. Is there someone specific who is the point of contact? Is that you David?
Paul S. Embley
National Center for State Courts
757 259 1844 (work)
757 345 1699 (cell)
From: David RR Webber (XML) <email@example.com>
Sent: Sun Jul 12 00:45:51 2009
Subject: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary alignment?
I've finally managed to crack the wantlist.xml processing against the online GTRI SSGT and NIEM 2.0 dictionary working for the HospitalStatus schema and using CAM compare to dictionary tool to reverse engineer the wantlist from the schema.
I've attached the sample wantlist.xml if you want to try this yourselves (click on the "Options" - far top right - and then you will see a select file and load buttons).
Now - when reviewing this - you will notice a raft of gml elements are missing (only a short list are there) - PLUS - there are many missing em: items.
So the key questions is - are these all missing ones now added into the new NIEM 2.1 dictionary release that is scheduled for September?
If not someone needs to contact GTRI very quickly this week - to make sure these will be added.
And if we could get a beta test of the Access database of the new NIEM 2.1 then would be best so we can crosscheck it all.