OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [emergency] CAP v1.2 schema(s) issue


Thanks Jacob,

Cheers,
Rex

Jacob Westfall wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   
>> Unfortunately, the schema in the document is different from the
>> free-standing schema.  In addition to a host of insignificant whitespace
>> changes:
>>     
>
> To be sure you are up to date, you should be using Committee Draft 04 as that is the version that will be voted on for the CS.  Yes there are differences in whitespace due to the Word document including line numbering.
>
>   
>> (a) the types of the <altitude> and <ceiling> elements are different
>> (xs:string in the free-standing schema vs. xs:decimalstring in the
>> schema in the document; note that decimalstring is not part of the XML
>> standard schema definition); and
>>     
>
> In both the included and standalone schemas the type is decimal.  The Public Review 02 Word document you are looking at is the marked up version and so appears as "decimalstring" but with a redline through string.
>
>   
>> (b) the <mimeType> element is optional in the schema in the document and
>> required in the free-standing schema
>>     
>
> This is again the marked up version looking different because of redlines.  In both included and standalone schemas the mimeType is required.
>
>   
>> So which schema is correct and/or normative, and will OASIS fix this
>> problem when CAP v1.2 moves from Public Review Draft status to Standard
>> status?  
>>     
>
> The standalone schema is authoritative.
>
>   

-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]