[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy
All, I wanting to thank everyone for their input on this issue and also want to pass along more information on it: The difference between a Standard and a Profile notwithstanding, the specific point is that the IPAWS Profile *document* (any of the documents under http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/ipaws-profile/v1.0/) and the IPAWS Profile *schema* (http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/ipaws-profile/v1.0/pr02/c apv1.2-ipaws-profile-v1.0-pr02.xsd) don't match. The documents indicate that <info> is optional, but the schema indicates that it is required. Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2025 mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: email@example.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From: Gilmore, Timothy Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:32 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy All, One of our engineers wanted me to pass along some information about another IPAWS Profile issue: CAP 1.2 specifies that the <info> element is optional (presumably, a "cancel," "update," "error," or "acknowledgement" alert could use the <references> element to specify a previous alert), and the IPAWS Profile document doesn't say otherwise. The IPAWS Profile *schema*, however, makes the <info> element *required*. Which is correct? Thanks, Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012 mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: email@example.com Please consider the environment before printing this email.