Re: [emergency] EDXL-DE 2.0 for the F2F - Objectivity, Subjectivity and Interpretation.

[Jacob Westfall <jake@jpw.biz>]

> For CAP:
> For example, consider the <circle> element.  Is the following a
> "correct" <circle> element?
> <circle> 0, 0, 150000000 </circle>

This is invalid according to CAP.

> It certainly fits the descriptions in that element's comments:  (1) it's
> in the form "latitude, longitude, radius"; (2) the central point
> conforms to WSG84; (3) the radius value is expressed in kilometers; and

That is not what the CAP spec says, this language is coming from the EDXL-DE spec and they differ on this element, which if is unintentional, needs to be corrected.

-- 
jake@jpw.biz
--