[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Version Control Commit by darrell.odonnell
Author: darrell.odonnell Date: 2014-02-08 17:50:58 +0000 (Sat, 08 Feb 2014) New Revision: 16 Web View: https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/emergency/?rev=16&sc=1 Added: HAVE/CODES-and-LOOKUPS.xlsx Modified: HAVE/defaults.txt HAVE/edxl-have-v2.0-wd.xsd Log: CHANGES (ADD, CHANGE, DELETION): * ADD: equivalentCode (under ServiceType- to allow an external system to indicate the equivalent code in another system. Allows 1?\226?\128?\166n * ADD: traumaCenterType - added new Type and assigned to facility child (traumaCenter) to handle Trauma Center details that are unique (primarily level). * CHANGE: changed ServiceListItemType name to ServiceType. This is much more consistent with the approach to date. * CHANGE: GeoLocationType - the srsName attribute for both wgs84Location and geoLocationExtended are now required (was optional). * CHANGE: ServiceCodeDefaultType - fleshed out the values using taxonomy based on type.subtype. HAVE1.0 and known ?\226?\128?\156used in the wild?\226?\128?\157 items are in. NOTE: the transport services were not carried forward as they are handled well elsewhere for the facility description. * ADD: created a spreadsheet for managing the codes. See CODES-and-LOOKUP.xlsx. It builds out the enumeration and annotation XML for pasting into the XSD. So far SERVICES are in. OPERATIONS * CHANGE: ResourceInformationType.resources had an ALL construct, now a SEQUENCE. The cardinality was whacked out due to the ALL but is fine now. DECISIONS: * serviceType has an extension capability - is this needed/warranted? * Extensions - should we review these? ISSUES: * ServiceCodeDefaultType is an edxl-ct:ValueType - which is an xs:string. Given the approaches elsewhere shouldn?\226?\128?\153t this be an xs:token? IDEA: RAISE to RIM.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]