OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (EMERGENCY-41) None of the RFC keywords appear to be used

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/EMERGENCY-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=59801#comment-59801 ] 

Darrell O'Donnell commented on EMERGENCY-41:

need to review and suggest places where these terms should (MUST?) be used.

> None of the RFC keywords appear to be used
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: EMERGENCY-41
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/EMERGENCY-41
>             Project: OASIS Emergency Management TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HAVE2
>         Environment: Normative
>            Reporter: Darrell O'Donnell
>            Assignee: Darrell O'Donnell
>            Priority: Minor
> TAB-1226
> "Keywords listed in Terminology: 
> ""The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in Error! Reference source not found.."" 
> Are not used in this spec, suggesting there is no normative content. You do not have to us these keywords but the normative content should be more clearly indicated. E.g. the conformance clause should explain what is to be interpreted as ""requirement"". Also, there is a broken ref in this section 1.1."
> Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]