OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emergency message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (EMERGENCY-44) Requirements in Section 4 are unclear

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/EMERGENCY-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=61241#comment-61241 ] 

Darrell O'Donnell commented on EMERGENCY-44:

NEED to edit the Conformance clause so it doesn't refer to Section 4 and refers to the Appendix instead.

> Requirements in Section 4 are unclear
> -------------------------------------
>                 Key: EMERGENCY-44
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/EMERGENCY-44
>             Project: OASIS Emergency Management TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HAVE2
>         Environment: Conformance
>            Reporter: Darrell O'Donnell
> TAB-1223	Requirements in Section 4 are unclear	"The conformance clause refers to Section 4, which itself only points at Appendix A, which contains a schema. (why not put this schema in Section 4?) 
> The conformance clause says"" 
> ""An XML 1.0 element is a conforming EDXL-HAVE-v2.0 Message if and only if: a) it meets the general requirements specified in Section 4..."" 
> But the Requirements in Section 4 are unclear 
> In fact, there is no clear requirement in Section 4. In the referred appendix there are tables with annotations that decorate the schema, some of these annotations use ""should"". Do such annotations contain the requirements? Is the requirement to validate against the schema? Then why not say so? 
> Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]