[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments on draft EMIX
Document http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/37959/emix-1.0-spec-wd-06.pdf
My comments are inline below. Thank you.
Section Line# Text Existing Language/Observation
2.2.2 Intrinsic elements Wouldn’t a price per rate of delivery e.g. $x/MWH at yMW be more explicit than total cost. It also supports next comment.
2.2.2 Intrinsic elements How does this model doesn’t support bid curves – monotonically increasing prices for energy for increasing delivery rates
2.2.2 The CAISO market has a three part bid that includes start-up cost and min load compensation. They can’t be taken separately.
2.2.2 I don’t see the unit/resource identifiers. These are necessary to discover registered quantities as registered in 3.1
2.2.2 OpeGML Reference?
2.2.2 An attribute for firm/non-firm would be useful, not sure if that’s intrinsic or not.
2.2.3 IEEE 1159 Reference?
3.1.1 AC Power Market does not distinguish between AC and DC delivered power, most attributes here are applicable to both.
2.2.2 CAISO also provides the ability to “bid” reduced performance attributes (e.g. ramp rates, start up time) that are lower than registered values for a unit. Does this need to be called out explicitly?
Line 366 distance for transmission Duplicated?
Sean Crimmins
Data Architect
Architecture and Systems Engineering
California ISO
Office (916) 608-5978
Cell (916) 802-4803
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]