OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [emix] What about Price Look-ahead.

Toby et al.:


If EMIX takes-on the look-ahead that I would argue is definitely needed for appliances to make more than simple, snap decisions about their energy use, then it is imperative that we figure-out a way to prevent gaming of the system by the “market makers” that will institute wholesale trading on the EMIX model.


That is to say, if this were compared to the stock-market model of electronic trading, “look-ahead” would be akin to soothsaying market trends and those with the quickest and most-connected systems could profit off the highs and lows to the detriment of the market as a whole.


Thoughts; both on my gaming theory as well as how to prevent problems with look-ahead?



- Jeremy


Jeremy J. Roberts

Technical Director

LonMark International





From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:57 AM
To: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [emix] What about Price Look-ahead.


Assume we have a basic Emix done. Does the specification include a look-ahead?





This is a market interaction pattern that properly belongs in EnergyInterop



Appliances and SEP 2.0 should need no more than EMIX. If Appliances and SEP need price look-ahead, than it goes into EMIX




"Energy and persistence conquer all things." -- Benjamin Franklin

Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

OASIS Technical Advisory Board
TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop


Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com

Phone: (919)619-2104


blog: www.NewDaedalus.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]