OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (EMIX-99) The term Product should beused through instead of terms such as resource, service, commodity, forexample.



     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated EMIX-99:
----------------------------

    Fix Version/s: wd11
                       (was: wd09)

> The term Product should be used through instead of terms such as resource, service, commodity, for example.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMIX-99
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-99
>             Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: wd09
>            Reporter: Edward Cazalet 
>            Assignee: William Cox
>             Fix For: wd11
>
>
> 254 :  This introduction clearly positions the EMIX information model  as focused on price and product definition and messaging for energy.
> 266:  For the first time we introduce the term "resource"  as in "energy and resource markets"  I see no clear purpose and possible confusion in using the term resource unless we are to better define the non-energy product emix one day may address.  I recommend droping the term "resource" here. I think we are talking about products as our more general  term and then  energy, then  electricity and then AC power specifically..
> 278  Here we introduce the term "commodity"  In common language this is no problem but to be more consistent we could use the term "product" instead.
> 308: this line introduces the concept of service - in general conversation I think there is no confusion, but I think we should stick to the term product which we can define elsewhere to include services if that is what we mean.
> 352 Change In EMIX, the product definition, in the form of a Resource (described below) is associated with an entire WS-Calendar Sequence or Partition. 
> to In EMIX, the product definition (described below) is associated with an entire WS-Calendar Sequence or Partition. 
> 356 2.4.2.1 Change Resource Model to Product Model and make the rest of the document to use only Product and not Resource.
> Since this a global change I will wait for feedback before suggesting changes to implement this suggestion.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]