[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emix] Documents and SGIP
Toby,
I still am not clear on why we need to go to PR to have something to discuss/present in Nashville. It seems we have good reasons to wait so that we can get a clean version of EMIX out. Why does going to PR help make a better “package” to present? And why then can’t we get a PR before Apr 15?
Thanks,
David
From: Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) [mailto:Toby.Considine@unc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:32 PM
To: Ed Cazalet; 'William Cox'; emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [emix] Documents and SGIP
It is if course up to the TC to decide what it wants to do, Mr Chair, but if we change anything, we will not start a PR before Tax Day.
From: Ed Cazalet [ed@cazalet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:11 PM
To: 'William Cox'; emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [emix] Documents and SGIPConcerning recommended changes to emix submitted before the meeting, will these be ignored until after the PR?
From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:59 AM
To: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emix] Documents and SGIP
I would suggest that the WS-Calendar schemas be marked "informative" so there's no confusion that EMIX is defining them. This could be an annotation in the schemas or simply in the namespace document.
Not sure how to do with "no change" but you seem to be contemplating replacing those with the PR02 WS-Calendar schemas.
Thanks!
bill
--William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax
On 3/23/11 12:21 PM, Toby Considine wrote:It has been suggested that we put together a package of EMIX work to share with the Nashville SGIP meeting. If you read the recent interpretation of the rules (Monday night) then you know that it cannot include any changes or directions received in tomorrow’s meeting.
You have all seen that EMIX (spec, schemas, and examples) was updated on Tuesday afternoon. If we want to share that work with the SGIP, then we should request a 2 week PR at the meeting.
Please be on the meeting (we need an absolute majority to vote a PR), and familiar with the latest documents and artifacts. In particular, I propose that a Public Review be based on
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41575/emix-1-0-spec-wd20.pdf
and
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41576/emix-1-0-schemas-wd20.zip
The note the other night stated that we must vote these documents, precisely, with no changes allowed of any kind.
We must, unfortunately, continue to carry the WS-Calendar schemas forward in this package as it is unclear if that TC will be able to pull off a second PR vote as they are not scheduled to meet this week.
If we are able to vote itout for PR, I will then propose that we distribute links and information to all PAP04, PAP04, and PAP09 (and the relevant DEWGS) before the weekend before the SGIP meeting.
Thanks
tc
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it” -- Upton Sinclair.
Toby Considine
TC9, IncOASIS Technical Advisory Board
TC Chair: oBIX & WS-CalendarTC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee
Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]