[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (EMIX-374) emix-warrants.xsd issues

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated EMIX-374:
-----------------------------

          Environment: William Cox
          Component/s: schema
    Affects Version/s: wd22
          Description: 
emix-warrants.xsd:

line 14: Why are "warrants" and "emix:WarrantsType" plural? Please check. Seems a bit confusing, as the only contained thing is ArrayOfWarrants" - why not just use "Warrants" for that?

line 24: why doesn't ArrayOfWarrants" have a "type" suffix?

Line 50 and 108: controlabilityWarrant is spelled differently than the table in the spec at line 757 (and incorrectly).  Change spelling to have two "l"s together, e.g. controllabilityWarrant, emix:ControllabilityWarrantType.

Line 108: comment says "A content warrant..." but the complexType is "ControllabilityWarrrantType". Correct comment. (spelling corrected in this note)

The specific warrants are empty; I presume the means of use is to extend them? A statement on that use should be in comments and in the spec.





> emix-warrants.xsd issues
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMIX-374
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-374
>             Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: schema
>    Affects Versions: wd22
>         Environment: William Cox
>            Reporter: William Cox
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>
> emix-warrants.xsd:
> line 14: Why are "warrants" and "emix:WarrantsType" plural? Please check. Seems a bit confusing, as the only contained thing is ArrayOfWarrants" - why not just use "Warrants" for that?
> line 24: why doesn't ArrayOfWarrants" have a "type" suffix?
> Line 50 and 108: controlabilityWarrant is spelled differently than the table in the spec at line 757 (and incorrectly).  Change spelling to have two "l"s together, e.g. controllabilityWarrant, emix:ControllabilityWarrantType.
> Line 108: comment says "A content warrant..." but the complexType is "ControllabilityWarrrantType". Correct comment. (spelling corrected in this note)
> The specific warrants are empty; I presume the means of use is to extend them? A statement on that use should be in comments and in the spec.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira