OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

emix message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (EMIX-384) wd23 csd02: Abstract --reduce ambiguity / improve consistency


wd23 csd02: Abstract -- reduce ambiguity / improve consistency
--------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: EMIX-384
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-384
             Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: spec
    Affects Versions: wd23
         Environment: Anne Hendry
            Reporter: Anne Hendry 
            Assignee: William Cox
            Priority: Minor


Abstract, first para, line 2:

- Delete first sentence.  It duplicates some thoughts in second sentence and also in some ways contradicts thoughts in second sentence.  Also is somewhat imprecise/ambiguous, as in "... but are be defined so as to support requirements for other markets.".  What other requirements, which other markets?  Also missing the word "to" (typo).

- Add "Deal/Bid/Acceptance Confirmation" bullet to list to align with list in TC Charter.

- Delete sentence after bulleted list.  Doesn't relate to what else being said there and obfuscates last sentence, which is a scoping statement, arguably the more important of the two.

- Last sentence:
Should
"It is not in scope for this TC to define specifications for markets ..."
instead be
"It is not in scope for this TC to specify market contexts ..." ?
And then possibly "... but to rather define the information exchanged in various market contexts."?
It just seems a bit circuitous to say the TC is not defining 'specifications for markets'.
As pointed out very recently, it is the "Energy Market Information Exchange" TC.
So need to clarify wording.  What is the idea this sentence was intended to convey?
Possible text update:
"It is not in scope for this TC to define market contexts, nor the mechanisms for market interoperation, nor how prices are determined ."
Not even quite sure about the last item there -- there are a myriad of things we could list as 'not in scope'.   Should there be more, or should there be any?  Should there be three?  Are these the right three?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]