I made the same point to Toby, but he said a change in name was not feasible at this time. I am fine with that.
From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:45 PM
To: Toby.Considine@gmail.com; 'Gerald Gray'; Joshua Phillips; 'Phil Davis'
Cc: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emix] RE: Offer Curves and Jira Issue 470
A bit late, but probably not relevant :-)
My concern with "IntegralOnly" is that it suggests the mathematical "integral value" - you can't have 10.4 you can have 10 or 11...so it's more like granularity.
If it's a part of the CIM that's used for this purpose, I don't have a problem.
AllOrNone seems to me to mean what's described, and "integral only" doesn't.
Closing the loop; the candidate release has IntegralOnly, and I'm fine with that - just wanted to explain my concern.
Yes, wd32-33 has IntegralOnly and I'm happy with the current drafts.
Thanks!
bill
--
On 6/19/11 11:33 PM, William Cox wrote:
The only suggestion I have at this point is to change the Boolean from IntegralOnly to "AllOrNone". Why introduce a new term that has to be defined?
Thanks!
bill
--
On 6/19/11 11:01 PM, Toby Considine wrote:
Probably works better if I send the PDF
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster, and if you stare long into an abyss, the abyss also stares into you." - Fredrich Nietzche
http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-470
The attached PDF now uses the elements found in the schema rather than those that appeared to be from an incomplete cut and paste. Excerpted here to enable easy fast comments
tc
“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
– George Bernard Shaw.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php