[OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (EMIX-516) Source and ContentWarrants

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated EMIX-516:
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fix editorial issue. Do not extend.
      Assignee: Toby Considine  (was: William Cox)

This is editorial. Geographical source is an unlikely addition; instead the characteristics of the source are relevant. In any event, content and/or source warrants are typically separated from the energy delivery and sold separately in today's markets.

1.0 addresses electrical markets; the extension is not in the TC work plan for this version.

> Source and Content Warrants
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMIX-516
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMIX-516
>             Project: OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: schema, spec
>    Affects Versions: CSD03/PR03
>         Environment: Source and Content Warrants
>            Reporter: Aaron Snyder 
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>
> Specification states:
> Content Warrant
> The proportion of the product defined that is from non-fossil fuel sources, including but not limited to "hydroelectric", "nuclear", "solar", and "wind".
> Source Warrant
> The product source. In aggregate may be the same as a Content Warrant.
> Schema states:
> <xs:documentation>A content warrant consists of assertions about where energy originated. </xs:documentation>
> <xs:documentation>A source warrant consists of assertions about through what proces energy originated. </xs:documentation>
> A few problems:
> 1. it appears there is no method to identify the "content" that is fossil based, since the description of "source" states "in aggregate may be the same as a Content Warrant" which one might interpret as meaning it is all non-fossil.
> 2. it is unclear how the schema documentation for content "about where energy originated" is aligned with the spec description
> 3. it is unclear how "about through what proces [sic] energy originated" actually means (typo does not in this case detract from apparent meaning)
> 4. it is unclear if the "where energy originated" in the content warrant refers to a physical location (a typical "where" answer) or to a fuel source, as its description implies.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira