RE: [emix] Source and Content

["Ed Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com>]

I recommend we can drop the Content Warrant.

 

Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D.

101 First Street, Suite 552

Los Altos, CA 94022

650-949-5274

cell: 408-621-2772

ed@cazalet.com

www.cazalet.com

 

From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 8:23 AM
To: Aaron Snyder; 'Edward G. Cazalet'; wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com
Cc: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [emix] Source and Content

 

The current specification has both Source and Content Warrants. I have been unable to find any definition that distinguishes between these two, and on the CPUC site, they appear to be identical.

 

Any suggestions? The choices are

(1)    Find a distinguishing definition

(2)    Delete one or the other.

 

 

---

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
– George Bernard Shaw.

---

Toby Considine TC9, Inc TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com Phone: (919)619-2104 http://www.tcnine.com/ blog: www.NewDaedalus.com