emix message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Not Allowed: Errata Committee Draft Creation / Upload Request for Energy Market Information Exchange (EMIX) Version 1.0
- From: Paul Knight <paul.knight@oasis-open.org>
- To: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:06:35 -0500
The following request has been
submitted to the OASIS TC Administrator on Thursday, November 17, 2011 - 22:12
Please note that this request does not conform to the OASIS Technical Committee Process, as established by the OASIS Board of Directors.
The TC Process is QUITE CLEAR on the point that "Errata" may apply only to OASIS Standards.
Please refer to the detailed comments below the request text.
OASIS TC Administration regrets that we cannot process or publish the material referenced in this request. An alternative course of action for the EMIX TC is suggested below.
***********************
Submitter's Name: William Cox
TC Name: Energy Market Information Exchange
TC Email Address: emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Work Product Title: Energy Market Information Exchange (EMIX) Version
1.0—Errata to Committee Specification 01
Working Draft Number: WD01
Working Draft URL:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=44383&wg_abbrev=emix
Errata Committee Draft ##: 01
Approval Link:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/44379/EMIX%2020111117%20Minutes%20Draft.docx
Notes:
See approval link for details. The errata to CS01 as approved are packaged as
above. Note that these are errata to a Committee Specification. They have been
approved as a Committee Specification Draft of errata and approved for 15 day
public review.
The specification for EMIX CS01 (CSPRD04) with changes applied and diffmarks
are in the archive as
* http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=44373&wg_abbrev=emix
(PDF with errata applied)
* http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=44373&wg_abbrev=emix
(DOC with errata applied)
* http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=44371&wg_abbrev=emix
(DOC with changes shown)
Please contact wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com with any questions.
***************************
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
(1) TC Process - Section 1 "Definitions" [1] item m.:
***********
- "Errata" means a set of changes or proposed changes to an OASIS Standard that are not Substantive Changes."
***********
(2) TC Process - Section 3 "Approval Process" Introduction: [2]
*************
Aside from approving Administrative Documents, the only document approvals a TC may validly perform are described in this Section.
Standards Track Work Products progress as follows:
1. Committee Specification Draft,
2. Committee Specification Public Review Draft,
3. Committee Specification,
4. Candidate OASIS Standard,
5. OASIS Standard,
6. Approved Errata.
[...]
Each of the progressions above must begin with step 1, and no step may be skipped. However a TC is not required to progress a Work Product from one step to the next.
*************
The "Approval Process" again makes it clear that there is no provision for "Errata" following a Committee Specification.
The suggested course of action is for the TC to approve a corrected Working Draft as a Committee Specification Draft, submit it for Public Review, and then approve it as a Committee Specification.
[1] http://oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#definitions
[2] http://oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#standApprovProcess