[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Initial Port of OpenADR to EnergyInterop
|
No real theory. I wanted to get
the text similar to correct, then decorate with diagrams as still needed. Many
of the diagrams were focused on interaction patterns and actors not part of the
first cut (or so it seemed) tc "A man should never be
ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which is but saying ... that he
is wiser today than yesterday." --
Jonathan Swift
From: Edward Koch
[mailto:ed@akuacom.com] Toby, As soon as I get myself out from
under the UCA meetings this week I will review this in more detail, but my
initial scan indicates that is that this is a reasonable first cut. I noticed
that there is a dearth of diagrams. Is there a specific reason for that? -ed koch From: Considine, Toby
(Campus Services IT) [mailto:Toby.Considine@unc.edu] Word document, PDF (for consistent line numbering) with
comments and notes turned on, Open Office file. Have not verified
OpenOffice formatting is entirely consistent. Notes: 1)
Port of what I think is the portion of OpenADR that is
we have agreed is part of the spec. I’m sure there are sins of both
inclusion and exclusion 2)
I have included comments on parts that I think we need
to discuss in the committee for focus and for direction 3)
Large table in section 3 – wasn’t sure
whether to include or exclude. 4)
Technical Artifacts (xsd, wsdl, etc) are coming under
separate cover from David Wilson 5)
There is no coherent description of the pure
priced-based model. Ed Cazalet has described the most coherent vision in the
past. I would welcome a few paragraphs. Ed? 6)
Load Profiles. How much load can I give up, how fast.
What is the model? 7)
Verification. Ugh. Ed K, Mary Anne – any missing parts that we need going
forward? If I were to take another couple weeks, I would further
normalize aganst SOA-RM and remove more definitions Committee Note: For non-normative working drafts, do we want
to create a separate document archive to keep them in, separate from the
consensus drafts and process-significant documents? tc "It is the theory that decides what can be observed." - Albert Einstein
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]