[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] Energy Usage Feedback
|
Are we assuming that the premise
EMS does not already communicate with an AMI meter from which it can receive
that information in real time? Or, are we suggesting this to be an exception
use case (in case there’s no AMI meter)? With kind regards, ******************************** Michel Kohanim,
C.E.O Universal
Devices, Inc. (p)
818.631.0333 (f)
818.708.0755 http://www.universal-devices.com ******************************** From: Larry Lackey
[mailto:llackey@tibco.com] Yes, I would think continuous, direct feedback to the premises is
essential for any smart interaction. Next day is like driving looking only in
your rear view mirror. However, if you see your usage is up and it is
expensive, you might walk around the house or check the business to see what is
going on and make changes before you exceed your contracted amount or get some
enormous bill. Larry From: Considine, Toby
(Campus Services IT) [mailto:Toby.Considine@unc.edu] One of the other priorities under the smart grid is feedback
to the premises EMS on actual energy use. The actual efforts to solve this problem seem, to date, to
be inward focused, i.e., how can we collect this info and send it back through
our substations to our CRMs. Personally, I think that something that looks like
an oBIX watchpoint, or an oBIX Trend Report internal to the building makes a
lot more sense. But if it must go back to the utility CRM, should Energy
Interoperation include an interaction to delver it back to the building? What
if it is not available for delivery until the next day? (The UCAIug calls this
“near real time”) tc "When one door closes, another opens; but we often look
so long and so regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the one
which has opened for us." -- Alexander Graham Bell
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]