[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: RE: [energyinterop] Groups - DR Programs (DR-Program-DRRC_20090914 SK edits.doc) uploaded
Let me say at the start that I'm always one to let a 1000 flowers bloom. So if we need EI to support some simple clients, let's put that in. But as much as research is a vital part of a Smart Grid development effort, research projects are not our goal. We're looking at 10's of millions of devices throughout North America for thousands of utility companies. We can't be making up custom code for every DR program. That's why the only DR protocol BAS's support now is <10 Hz dry contact closures from the Interval Meter. I don't believe any BAS vendors sell product features that take only an hour of software development--much as I hate to admit we have a bloated Engineering Development Process where it takes more than an hour to pull down all the project document templates. Other than Process, I expect any SG product development will spend a big chunk of time in conformance/interoperability testing. Another big chunk will be taken up by meeting the security requirements of the Smart Grid. I've seen it up close, and the US Utilities are excessively conservative (EU Utilities less so) with respect to security. The CSCTG < http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/CyberSecurit yCTG > headed by Annabel Lee of NIST has kept a low profile, but it's a crosscutting issue that affects every aspect of the SG. I expect this site < http://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/suiteb_cryptography/index.shtml > on Elliptic Curve Cryptography is another place to start slogging through. We'll all be sitting down with the Munitions Export lawyers for some cozy chats about what to do so we can sell this stuff outside the US. Best, B.O. December 4, 2009 Robert Old Siemens Industry, Inc. Building Technologies 1000 Deerfield Pkwy. Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-4513 Tel.: +1 (847) 941-5623 Skype: bobold2 bob.old@siemens.com www.siemens.com -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watson [mailto:dwatson@lbl.gov] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 2:38 PM To: michel@universal-devices.com; energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: RE: [energyinterop] Groups - DR Programs (DR-Program-DRRC_20090914 SK edits.doc) uploaded As part of our research, LBNL interviewed programmers who wrote code to implement both smart clients (including control logic) and simple clients (include a few integers, no logic). Research showed that programmers from multiple companies using a variety of programming platforms could consistently take a pseudo code template from LBNL, and create a simple software client application in less than one hour. I interviewed four programmers that wrote "simple" software client code to interface between their EMCS and the DRAS (circa 2005). The answers to "time to complete task?" were: 1) 20 min. 2) 60 min. 3) 20 min. 4) less than 20 min. (not a measurable task). The same question was asked of five "smart client" programmers that wrote code to interface between their EMCS and the "Price Server" (circa 2003). Since they were required to include logic and other complexities the task took from "weeks to months". To keep the technical and economic bar to entry as low as possible, we should keep the simple client (or equal) in the spec. -Dave Watson LBNL [Old, Bob] <snip>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]