OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

energyinterop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [energyinterop] RE: Signal Types

I think this quote I extracted from one of Ed's comment in the chain is, perhaps, foundational.


"Having a device communicate its response back between the domains is of little value unless the trust in the response is equivalent to that of a sub meter in that the response can be used for billing."  Ed Cazalet


If you look at the costs involved to having a device equal a revenue grade AMI meter in reliability, security, and be abile to maintain the verification of the response, will it have a valid cost/benefit for anything but very large loads?  


The other buring question is, can it be spoofed for financial gain?  The ATTACHED IMAGE IS A SPOOF sent to me from a friend. But it makes an obvious point.  The position is that a DR should be verifiable and impact standard energy measurment and billing methods.  Otherwise it’s success and verification may always be in question.







-----Original Message-----
  ...  long chain removed  ...




Ebay UtiliCheat.jpg

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]