RE: [energyinterop] Not To Exceed

[Edward Koch <ed@akuacom.com>]

I don’t know if it has to be one or the other, but it is clearly an EITC thing if it involves load profiles.

 

 

-ed koch

 

 

---

From: Toby Considine [mailto:tobyconsidine@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Toby Considine
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:43 AM
To: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org; emix@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [energyinterop] Not To Exceed

 

DR – and Verification, and Verification is the conundrum. Verification is the problem because DR are is a promise to reduce load by a certain amount from an uncertain beginning end point to an unknown end point.

 

What about an agreement that “I will use no more than xxx” as a DR offering. It becomes entirely results oriented (good for a service). It would be more valuable if it warranted “no spikes” rather than merely total use for a [15 minute] period. It certainly would be callable.

 

Do we adopt this? If so,  does it look like

 

[emix – this is for max use]

 

Or does it look like

 

[Eitc: I will commit not to exceed

    [emix]

]

 

In other words, is max an EITC or EMIX thing…

 

tc

 

---

"Energy and persistence conquer all things." -- Benjamin Franklin

---

Toby Considine TC9, Inc OASIS Technical Advisory Board TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com Phone: (919)619-2104 http://www.tcnine.com/ blog: www.NewDaedalus.com