OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

energyinterop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: Section Four proposal



I like this. I think it captures the DR service roles well. What other roles do we have? Do we need to talk about ISOs and utilities and CSP? What about for generic transactional energy, or specific transaction types?




From: Walker, Doug [mailto:DWalker@caiso.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 2:57 PM
To: energyinterop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [energyinterop] Section Four proposal


Here is a quick draft to give some ideas of a rework of section 4.  I tried to make it in line with discussions today regarding ‘Party’.  I did not have the original graphics, so I had to create new ones, but the main point was to put forth the idea that Actor is a role that a particular entity can play.  This will potentially change for each atomic service interaction. 


Also, are we using the NAESB work for context of individual services?  If so, that should be added to the NAESB section (currently placeholder) and we can concentrate on the individual services.


As this is a radical change, I wanted to get it out early to see if this was along the lines of the group’s thoughts.


Thank you,
Douglas Walker

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]