[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Section Four proposal
Doug, I like this. I think it captures
the DR service roles well. What other roles do we have? Do we need to talk about
ISOs and utilities and CSP? What about for generic transactional energy, or
specific transaction types? David From: Walker, Doug
[mailto:DWalker@caiso.com] Here is a quick draft to give some ideas of a rework of
section 4. I tried to make it in line with discussions today regarding
‘Party’. I did not have the original graphics, so I had to create new
ones, but the main point was to put forth the idea that Actor is a role that a
particular entity can play. This will potentially change for each atomic
service interaction. Also, are we using the NAESB work for context of individual
services? If so, that should be added to the NAESB section (currently
placeholder) and we can concentrate on the individual services. As this is a radical change, I wanted to get it out early to
see if this was along the lines of the group’s thoughts. Thank
you,
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]