[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Section Four proposal
Doug, FYI earlier this week within the OpenADR
taskforce of UCA we did an analysis to map the services in the NAESB requirements
doc with the services in the OpenADR 1.0 specification. That work is
applicable to an analysis within the EI TC since many of those services are
also derived fro the OpenADR 1.0 specification. Thanks, -ed koch From: Walker, Doug
[mailto:DWalker@caiso.com] Here
is a quick draft to give some ideas of a rework of section 4. I tried to
make it in line with discussions today regarding ‘Party’. I did not have
the original graphics, so I had to create new ones, but the main point was to
put forth the idea that Actor is a role that a particular entity can
play. This will potentially change for each atomic service
interaction. Also,
are we using the NAESB work for context of individual services? If so,
that should be added to the NAESB section (currently placeholder) and we can
concentrate on the individual services. As
this is a radical change, I wanted to get it out early to see if this was along
the lines of the group’s thoughts. Thank you, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]